<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KevinDayton.com &#187; t-mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevindayton.com/tag/t-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevindayton.com</link>
	<description>Tech, music, and religious nerdery since 1978.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Voice iPhone app saga goes to the FCC [Updated]</title>
		<link>http://kevindayton.com/2009/08/21/the-google-voice-iphone-app-saga-goes-to-the-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://kevindayton.com/2009/08/21/the-google-voice-iphone-app-saga-goes-to-the-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kevindayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindayton.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USA Today is reporting (via MacRumors) that comments are being filed with the FCC regarding Apple&#8217;s rejection of the Google Voice app in the iPhone App Store.  Apparently, Apple is not the only company facing questions.  Google may have some questions to answer on the related subject of the crippled version of Skype on their Android [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-08-20-google-internet-calls-apple_N.htm">USA Today is reporting</a> (via <a title="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/08/21/comments-on-google-voice-rejection-filed-today-google-under-scrutiny-for-similar-actions/" href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/08/21/comments-on-google-voice-rejection-filed-today-google-under-scrutiny-for-similar-actions/" target="_blank">MacRumors</a>) that comments are being filed with the FCC regarding <a title="http://kevindayton.com/2009/07/28/regarding-google-voice-the-iphone-and-rejection/" href="http://kevindayton.com/2009/07/28/regarding-google-voice-the-iphone-and-rejection/" target="_self">Apple&#8217;s rejection of the Google Voice app</a> in the iPhone App Store.  Apparently, Apple is not the only company facing questions.  Google may have some questions to answer on the related subject of the crippled version of <a title="http://share.skype.com/sites/skypegear/2009/01/video_skype_lite_on_android.html" href="http://share.skype.com/sites/skypegear/2009/01/video_skype_lite_on_android.html" target="_blank">Skype on their Android operating system</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Why: Consumers who use Android, the Google-developed operating system for wireless devices, can&#8217;t use <a title="More news, photos about Skype" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Culture/Computers+and+Internet/Software/Skype" target="_blank">Skype</a>, a leading Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service. A pioneer in free Internet calling, Skype allows you to talk as long as you want without draining cellphone minutes.</p>
<p>Android users get Skype Lite, a watered-down version of the original that routes calls over traditional phone networks — not the Internet. As a result, long-distance calls are still cheap or free, but cellphone minutes are gobbled up every time a Skype Lite call is made&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;Google&#8217;s explanation would seem to suggest that T-Mobile requested the block on Skype, but the carrier says that&#8217;s not the case. &#8220;T-Mobile has not asked Google to block that service,&#8221; says spokesman Joe Farren, referring to original Skype [sic]. <em>&#8211; USA Today</em></p></blockquote>
<p>In both of these cases, it is clear that neither the carriers nor OS providers want to take the blame.  Maybe the FCC can break this problem open and make progress, but <a title="http://kevindayton.com/2009/07/31/the-fcc-wants-to-know-more-about-the-gv-app-rejection/" href="http://kevindayton.com/2009/07/31/the-fcc-wants-to-know-more-about-the-gv-app-rejection/" target="_self">as stated before</a>, &#8220;consider me skeptical.&#8221;</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a title="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/atandt-tells-the-fcc-it-had-no-role-in-removing-google-voice-fro/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/atandt-tells-the-fcc-it-had-no-role-in-removing-google-voice-fro/" target="_blank">Apple says</a> it acted alone in rejecting the app.  Something still smells fishy here, but if this is the case, bad Apple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevindayton.com/2009/08/21/the-google-voice-iphone-app-saga-goes-to-the-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

