<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KevinDayton.com &#187; ibm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevindayton.com/tag/ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevindayton.com</link>
	<description>Tech, music, and religious nerdery since 1978.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CNet: Oracle to buy Sun</title>
		<link>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/20/cnet-oracle-to-buy-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/20/cnet-oracle-to-buy-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kevindayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drizzle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mariadb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindayton.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months of rumors that IBM was to acquire Sun, Cnet is reporting that Sun is selling, but not to IBM, rather to Oracle. The deal is reportedly worth $7.4B. I you&#8217;ve read my blog, you&#8217;ll know that my primary concern with the acquisition of Sun from any company is the fate MySQL, which Sun [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After months of rumors that IBM was to acquire Sun, <a title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10223044-92.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10223044-92.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_blank">Cnet is reporting</a> that Sun is selling, but not to IBM, rather to Oracle.  The deal is reportedly worth $7.4B.</p>
<p>I you&#8217;ve read my blog, you&#8217;ll know that my primary concern with the acquisition of Sun from any company is the fate MySQL, which Sun purchased last year.  Leading up to that purchase, Oracle had failed several times to buy MySQL itself, which I was happy about.  MySQL offers database software in a market in which Oracle has yet to find a foothold, and I feared that Oracle acquiring the company might stifle the development of the open source product.</p>
<p>So here we are about a year later and Oracle ends up with MySQL via Sun.  What will happen to MySQL now?  Maybe it will be good for it or maybe bad, or maybe its open source roots will see its core survive under a different name like <a title="http://askmonty.org/wiki/index.php/MariaDB" href="http://askmonty.org/wiki/index.php/MariaDB" target="_blank">MariaDB </a>or <a title="https://launchpad.net/drizzle" href="https://launchpad.net/drizzle" target="_blank">Drizzle</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/20/cnet-oracle-to-buy-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ.com: IBM, Sun Talks Dying Quickly?</title>
		<link>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/05/wsjcom-ibm-sun-talks-dying-quickly/</link>
		<comments>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/05/wsjcom-ibm-sun-talks-dying-quickly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kevindayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindayton.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like IBM&#8217;s bid to buy Sun might be fading according to the Wall Street Journal. I guess $7B was too low for Sun to consider it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like IBM&#8217;s bid to buy Sun might be fading <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123896664697090681.html#mod=testMod">according to the Wall Street Journal</a>.  I guess $7B was too low for Sun to consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/05/wsjcom-ibm-sun-talks-dying-quickly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times: IBM to pay $7B for Sun</title>
		<link>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/03/ny-times-ibm-to-pay-7b-for-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/03/ny-times-ibm-to-pay-7b-for-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kevindayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindayton.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned a couple of weeks ago, IBM is looking to acquire Sun. According to the NY Times, the acquisition appears to be imminent for a cool $7 billion (h/t Slashdot). My main question is &#8220;what will happen to MySQL?&#8221;, especially in the midst of confusion over what the real version of the popular DB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a title="http://kevindayton.com/2009/03/18/ibm-to-buy-sun/" href="http://kevindayton.com/2009/03/18/ibm-to-buy-sun/">mentioned a couple of weeks ago</a>, IBM is looking to acquire Sun. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/technology/business-computing/03blue.html?_r=1&amp;ref=technology" target="_new">According to the NY Times</a>, the acquisition appears to be imminent for a cool $7 billion (h/t <a title="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/03/1321221&amp;from=rss" href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/03/1321221&amp;from=rss" target="_new">Slashdot</a>).</p>
<p>My main question is &#8220;what will happen to MySQL?&#8221;, especially in the midst of <a title="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/30/228214" href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/30/228214" target="_new">confusion over what the real version of the popular DB software really is</a>.  According to the Times article, though, MySQL could be a key reason that IBM is making this move.</p>
<blockquote><p>I.B.M.’s acquisition of Sun would disrupt that long partnership with Oracle. I.B.M. could also undercut Oracle by more actively promoting the free MySQL software, which has become the most popular database software with Internet companies.  &#8211; NY Times article</p></blockquote>
<p>My gut says <a title="http://www.zend.com/" href="http://www.zend.com/" target="_new">Zend</a> is next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevindayton.com/2009/04/03/ny-times-ibm-to-pay-7b-for-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM to buy Sun?</title>
		<link>http://kevindayton.com/2009/03/18/ibm-to-buy-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://kevindayton.com/2009/03/18/ibm-to-buy-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kevindayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindayton.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times is reporting (via Slashdot) that IBM and Sun are in talks regarding the former acquiring the latter. The Wall Street Journal, quoting “people familiar with the matter,” reported Wednesday that International Business Machines was in talks to buy Sun for at least $6.5 billion in cash, a premium of more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/19/business/19markets.html" target="_new">The New York Times is reporting</a> (via <a title="http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/2g-zycOTk5o/article.pl" href="http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/2g-zycOTk5o/article.pl" target="_new">Slashdot</a>) that IBM and Sun are in talks regarding the former acquiring the latter.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Wall Street Journal, quoting “people familiar with the matter,” reported Wednesday that International Business Machines was in talks to buy Sun for at least $6.5 billion in cash, a premium of more than 100 percent over the company’s closing share price Tuesday. Officials of Sun and IBM could not immediately be reached for comment.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an interesting development considering Sun&#8217;s <a title="http://kevindayton.com/2008/01/16/mysql_ab_acquired_by_sun/" href="http://kevindayton.com/2008/01/16/mysql_ab_acquired_by_sun/" target="_new">recent acquisition of MySQL AB</a>, and IBM&#8217;s <a title="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/05/will-ibm-buy-zend-php.html" href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/05/will-ibm-buy-zend-php.html" target="_new">speculated interest in Zend</a>, the primary developers of PHP.  Such a series of purchases would put IBM in a solid position to start using buzzwords like &#8220;cloud computing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevindayton.com/2009/03/18/ibm-to-buy-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
